Showing posts with label ghost. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ghost. Show all posts

Philip the Imaginary Ghost

A transcript of two programmes you can watch here on YouTube. 

They feature AR George Owens and Iris Owens' Philip Experiment. It's really interesting to see the group in action around the table. I'm not so sure there's some strange force at work tipping the table. I mean they don't believe there's a ghost tipping the table - that's the whole point of the experiment. But they do seem to believe there's some weird force going on. And having done the old 'levitation' trick at school where you lift someone up - well no, you don't feel like you're doing anything. But that doesn't mean that you aren't.

The bumps are of course much more interesting - assuming someone isn't making them deliberately by cracking their knuckles on the table or something. You'd like to think they'd have the integrity not to. But perhaps meeting every week gets boring if nothing happens. If there are genuinely bumping noises, well that's something that does need explaining.

It would also be interesting to find out more about 'Lileth' from the other experiment that was running. I'd not heard of this before. I wonder how many other experiments have ever been run? The problem of course is that they're rather time-consuming and you need committed participants.


Philip the Imaginary Ghost (1974 documentary).

Narrator: Over the last hundred years or so there have been many groups of people who meet regularly to sit in what are called mediumistic circles. This is done in the hope of receiving messages from the spirits of their deceased friends and relatives. In a typical sitting or séance the participants are seated with their hands on top of the table, sometimes with their fingers touching, sometimes not. It is said that the spirit who is supposed to be present often causes a variety of strange physical effects to occur, as suggested by this engraving made in 1871 when spiritualism was in its heyday. In the old days there was serious doubt as to whether these phenomena were genuine. It was believed that for them to occur, a specially endowed person known as a spirit medium had to be present if the spirits were to be able to manifest these effects. Undoubtedly many of these spirit mediums were fraudulent. 

It was also easy to cheat because it was believed that the sittings or seances had to be in darkness or in a subdued light. Research by Sir William Crookes who worked with the famous medium D D Home in a good light, and by Harry Price and other famous investigators who studied Stella Cranshaw in 1923, proved that some of these physical phenomena were genuine and not the result of trickery. Whether we believe in spirits or not, it shows that there are forces in the universe at present unknown to science, and different from the four forces known to physicists. 

In 1972 a group consisting of eight members of the Society for Psychical Research in Toronto, Canada, decided to find out more about this mysterious force. They wanted to find out firstly whether it could be produced in full light. Secondly, whether a spirit medium was necessary or if instead it could be generated by ordinary people. And thirdly, if the force was produced by disembodied spirit, or instead was generated by the living participants in the circle. Dr George Owen, director of the Toronto SPR, guided the sessions from the beginning.

George Owens: The members of the group are regarded as perfectly normal people, or as normal as anyone can actually be. Four are housewives, Sue, Dorothy, Andi and Iris. Sid is a salesman, Bernice an accountant, Al is an engineer, and Lorne a designer. None of them claimed to be a medium. Psychical research is just one of their many diverse interests. As researchers the group had to be scrupulous in their approach. The first problem they had to solve was this – how to be sure that if they got physical effects, these were not due to a spirit. So they decided to make up a completely fictional character. An imaginary person with the given name of Philip, and a completely imaginary biography. A week later, she [Sue] narrated the story of Philip. 

“Philip was as aristocratic Englishman, living in the middle 1600s at the time of Oliver Cromwell. He was married to a beautiful but cold and frigid wife Dorothea. One day when out riding Philip came across a gypsy encampment and saw there a beautiful gypsy girl, Margot, and fell instantly in love with her. He brought her back secretly to live in the gatehouse near the stables of Diddington Manor, his family home. For some time he kept his love nest a secret, but eventually Dorothea, realising he was keeping someone else there, found Margot and accused her of witchcraft and stealing her husband. Philip was too scared of losing his reputation and his possessions to protest at the trial of Margot, and she was convicted of witchcraft and burned at the stake. Philip was subsequently stricken with remorse. Finally one morning his body was found at the bottom of the battlements where he had cast himself in a fit of agony and remorse.
“Ooh that’s nice story! You really used your imagination on that one!”

The group discussed the character and life they had given Philip until they were all agreed on the details. A picture was drawn by Andi and agreed to be a true likeness of Philip. It should be stressed that although Diddington Manor is a real place, there is no evidence that no one like Philip ever lived there. In addition, some historical errors were deliberately introduced into the story to emphasise its fictitious nature.

To consolidate the idea of Philip and to put themselves in mutual rapport, the group met weekly to meditate on Philip and his adventures. No apparition of Philip appeared, but observers occasionally noted a slight mistiness in the centre of the circle. However, this may merely have resulted from visual fatigue. In the fall of 1973, the group changed their approach as the result of reading articles by Mr [?] and Mr Brooksmith and Mr Hunt which appeared in the British SPR. These investigators have got physical effects by sitting round the table as in the old spiritual seances, but they created an atmosphere of jollity and relaxation. They told jokes, sang songs and exhorted the table in a light-hearted way to obey their commands. The Toronto group adopted the same approach, singing such ditties as Lloyd George Knew My Father, to the tune of Onward Christian Soldiers, playing music such as Greensleeves or Amazing Grace, and addressing questions to the table as if it really were Philip.

And between sittings, objects [familiar?] to Philip, such as fencing foils, 17th century manuscripts and pictures of Diddington Hall were kept. For most sittings the same four-legged table was used.


Narrator: It’s not easy for eight responsible normal adults to fool around in this way. They had to train themselves in a particular psychological attitude. They had to imitate a stage comedian who may give a very farcical performance on stage, but off the stage is sober and practical. As soon as the group adopted this new approach they got phenomena. First there came a vibration in the table. Also raps came out of the table. They seemed to come from inside the woodwork.

“Hello Philip, are you there?” “Good morning Philip” “Hi Philip, I heard you bought some more new horses.” “Come on, speak up, let’s hear some knocks.” “Come on let’s get some bangs. Come on, let’s get going.” “Have you brought Dorothea with you. Have you seen Dorothea lately? No? Would you like to see Dorothea lately? No? Didn’t you love Dorothea in your time? No. That was two. Yes we need them louder. Do it louder. Did you like Dorothea? (Knock knock). Ooh! Did you love – Margot?! Yes! Say it again, did you love Margot? (Knock). Good.

(The table rocks about).

GO: Then the table would actually move, it would glide over the thick pile carpet or even rear up on one or two legs only. Attempts to reproduce this motion by pushing always failed. It was impossible to imitate the table’s spontaneous motion.

Narrator: The group had succeeded many times. Visitors have watched the proceedings in bright light or even joined the group at the table. It’s clear that there’s no possibility that the phenomena is produced by trickery. The society’s research committee under Professor Owen has taken every precaution to obviate fraud and can state categorically that the phenomena are genuine and paranormal.

(Much rather drunken sounding singing ‘Up in the air and upside down!’. The table tips towards one side, until on its side completely).

GO: We found that Philip, the imaginary communicator, will answer questions put to him by sitters or visitors. One rap for yes, two raps for no. Philip of course has no independent existence. He says just what a majority of the sitters happen to think he ought to say. It is a case of psychokinesis by committee. If a question has an obvious answer, the response, in the form of one rap or two, comes promptly and with emphasis. If however, the members of the committee take time to individually reason out what the question means, or are doubtful as to the right answer, then the response is feebler and delayed.


Narrator: Dr Joel Whitton, a medical psychologist, was asked to comment: “Well I’d first like to emphasise that this is an important experiment because it’s done in the laboratory and it’s reproduceable. Now from the psychological point of view there are several considerations. First is, I have to ask myself what are the psychological conditions necessary to produce this phenomenon? It seems to me that the group is in a childlike creativity. This is brought on by the playing and the singing and the humour. The group lets their hair down. As opposed to the adult who says ‘This phenomena can’t be done because its against the laws of physics’ the child simply says ‘If I want to do it, it can be done’. Now second, I ask myself ‘What does this rapping and the table turning mean symbolically? Is it some type of concentration of energy or er, is it an elaborate defence mechanism against some deep-seated unconscious conflict? Third, the group is involved in a joint feeling of mutuality. Each member almost intuitively senses the other person and their feelings, and as such it has important overtones in various group programmes.”

One of the group: I think this Philip experiment has forced me to look at the whole spectrum of parapsychology. I’ve always believed that there’s a little bit of telepathy and precognition. But two years ago if you had told me that a group of us would be able to take this table and move it without any physical force, I, I think I would have laughed at you.

“This whole concept has made me much more aware of energy forces around – before you were aware of but didn’t really think about.”

GO: “I can’t see any way that any of this can move the table ourselves so there’s got to be energy or something which would be very interesting if we could find out how it works.”

Sue: “The experiment on Philip has been a very exciting thing for me because it’s taken an abstract thought of mine and made it into a concrete experiment.”

Lorne: “It’s offered an alternative explanation to me for the theory of spirits of the dead causing hauntings. The hauntings seem to be real but I have no faith in the departed spirits theory.”

“I think it’s been the most exciting parapsychological experiment that I’ve ever taken part in. We’ve been interested in these physical phenomena for so many years and I feel that at last we’ve made a breakthrough.”

Narrator: The group of eight has shown that a group of normal non-mediumistic people can acquire a kind of psychological skill enabling them to generate a strong physical force without the aid of spirits or supernatural influence. They have proved that this force is latent in most ordinary human beings. To gain understanding of this force they are continuing their work. They hope also that with new and original variations it will be imitated by other investigators.

II

ESP- Extra Special People - with Allen Spraggett.

AS: On this programme you meet ESP – Extra Special People – who explore that shadowy world that lies on the border between science and superstition, the known and the unknown. And on the programme today, you won’t believe it, our guest is a talking table called Philip. Now just a minute, before you tune out, I’ve not freaked out completely! We’ll explain who and what Philip the talking table is. I have a guest in human form – Mrs Iris Owen of the Toronto S PR. And of course Iris, we’ve worked together in the society for some time now. Tell us about Philip, the talking table, the imaginary ghost – how the whole thing started.

IO: Well it sounds absolutely crazy of course, but in fact it is a serious scientific experiment. George and I, my husband, have been interested in this field for many years.

AS: Now let me just say Iris, because you might be too modest – your husband George Owen is a distinguished parapsychologist as well as being a noted scientist in other areas.

IO: Yes indeed, and we were very fortunate to come to Canada five years ago to devote most of our time to the fringe areas of science and particularly parapsychology. This actual experiment arose out of a discussion we were having one night on ‘what was the nature of a ghost’. And it followed the investigation that we had done in Toronto of a haunted house where in fact some of our investigating team had seen what they thought was an hallucination or a ghost, and we discussed what it could be. Was it really the spirit of departed people, and we couldn’t believe this was so – but if it was an hallucination (which was the conclusion we came to), well why can’t we create our own hallucination? If we could create our own hallucination ourselves, then we would know a bit more about this. So we decided to make our own ghost. We called the group that were doing it ‘the ghost-creating group’. We didn’t know at first how to go about it – there aren’t any do-it-yourself ideas about it. So we decided that if we were going to prove that it wasn’t a departed spirit we had to invent a story, a character, not even a well-known story book character would do. One of our group, Sue, who had a beautiful imagination, invented our ghost for us. And then we spent a year, and I mean one night every week a for a whole year, we spent in meditation and thinking about our ghost and trying to conjure up a vision of him.

AS: Now you had a character, you invented him, you gave him a name – Philip, and you gave him a history, and then you tried to get him to communicate. What was the history of Philip?

IO: Well we set him in the 1500s in England at the time of Oliver Cromwell. He was a Cavalier, he had been a supporter of Charles. He was married to a beautiful and frigid wife Dorothea, married for the sake of joining the estates. He was riding around his estates one day and he met a beautiful gypsy girl, Margot, dark eyes, beautiful gypsy girl, and he fell instantly in love with her. Took her back to the castle where he hid her in the stables or in the dower house, and later his wife discovered her and blamed her, charged her with witchcraft and said she’d stolen her husband. And Philip himself was too concerned both for his own personal safety (by then Cromwell was on the throne) and also for the financial side of his estates, to defend her, and so she was tried and burnt at the stake.

AS: He was a craven wretch!

IO: Well we didn’t think he was quite that craven! In fact afterwards he was so distraught that he jumped from the battlements of the castle one night, and his body was found at the foot of the battlements. And then in the story that Sue invented, every century or so his ghost is seen walking the battlements searching for his lost love.

AS: OK, how did you go about getting this imaginary ghost to communicate?

IO: Well as I say, at first we, we, meditated for a whole year and we didn’t get anything very much in the way of results, and were beginning to feel a bit despondent and maybe we were wrong after all. And then we came across the work of some English experimenters in the British Society for Psychical Research, some eight to nine years ago, where they had worked on an experiment to make a table rise, to levitate a table. They were working on what we call (in the trade I was going to say, but as parapsychologists) the physical phenomena: rappings, movement, the sound of trumpets, the kind of thing that happened a great deal in the Victorian-type séance room when spiritualism began, and when this kind of thing was more of a parlour game than anything in its beginning. But [Kenneth Spatcheldore] had evolved a theory that if you trained yourself in a certain psychological skill, which was similar to the Victorian séance room, in other words if you sat around and sang repetitive songs and you told jokes and you worked in a relaxed atmosphere and literally ‘got into the spirit of the thing’, you would produce these physical phenomena, the raps and so on.
At that stage we said to ourselves well if this works for physical phenomena, why shouldn’t it produce our ghost? And so we decided to try this. Now we read the literature very thoroughly and there are many many papers on it. There is a philosophical reasoning as to why it works – and this is too short a programme for me to explain it. And we tried it, and the first sitting or two we were a little bit self-conscious. It’s not very easy, we’re all serious scientifically-minded people really. And to sit around and do all this sort of nonsense – talk to a table! We weren’t at that stage thinking we were talking to the table. We were surprised when suddenly one night we heard a rap from the table. Quite a loud rap! And we thought, you know – what is this? And we sat there very much surprised, and I think Dorothy said ‘perhaps it’s Philip!’ and immediately there was another rap. And so we said ‘Rap once for yes and two for no – are you Philip?’ and there was another rap.
And so this did surprise us very much. We carried on a little conversation like this rather non-plused the first time.

 AS: Did you get movements then rather quickly?

IO: Shortly afterwards the table kind of slid a bit, and we accused each other of pushing it, naturally. We couldn’t believe it would move by itself. In fact the first few months we were watching each other like hawks, and if anybody’s finger moved the slightest bit – you’re pushing! This sort of thing.

AS: Iris, we're going to take a break. We’re going to come back and introduce our viewers to Philip the talking table, and the rest of the Philip group. And we hope Philip will put in an appearance and do some communicating with us today.



III

(The group are stood around a table with their fingers on it).

AS: Here we are, and our guest is Philip the talking table and his eight friends, and you’re going to be introduced to each one of them in a moment. Right now Philip has been communicating through some raps.

(Various members of the group talking in a tone usually applied condescendingly to a child or animal): Come on – a real loud one! Come on! Say hello! That’s right, now do it louder. Say hello to all the people. It’s a big audience you’ve got out there. Say hello to everybody. (The table creaks). Go on, show off. You know you’re a ham actor. You can do it. A really loud one. Look we don’t want you to move, we want lots of nice loud raps. Come on! We’ll sing you a song.

AS: Why don’t we go around the table and each one of you give your name and say hello to Philip and we’ll ask him to respond.

IO: Hello Philip, this is Iris, you know me! Say hello. No, he’s not.

Hi Philip, this is Sidney, are you gong to say hi today? A little one?

AS: I’ve should say we’ve got a microphone under the table to pick up these ‘pings’ or raps.
(slight ticking)

It’s Andi. Gonna say hi to me? You said it before.

Hello Philip, it’s Bernice, are you gonna say hello tonight? Good, yes…

IO: Louder, Philip.

Lorne: Hello Philip! Did I get one there?

You try . Oh yes! One for Al. He likes Al.

AS: A little louder, Philip, if you please.

Hi Philip, it’s Dorothy here! (ooh there’s one)

Hello Philip, it’s Sue. (a bump and an ooh)

Say hello to Allen.

AS: Hello Philip. (thud) – there’s a good one. Another one.
AS: I think we should say that these raps have come in a number of different circumstances with outside witnesses present, including a psychiatrist, and they have agreed that the raps do indeed seem to come from inside the table. They’re not being produced by anybody here. The microscope is picking up these raps and they do seem to come from inside the table.

IO: You can see that all our hands are absolutely still and we’re standing up and our feet are on a carpeted floor so nobody could be kicking or tapping, or the sort of things that are usually alleged.

AS: Right. Why don’t you ramp it up and see if Philip will put on some antics for us.

IO: Oh I’m sure he will. There’s nothing he likes better. (Much hubbub) Come on! Show them what you can do! Right up in the air! (The table tips and sways quite violently. They sing in a drunken fashion. The table almost tips over.) Mind the microphone, Philip! (One table leg folds under the table. The microphone falls over). Bring it back here Philip! Mind the microphone! Let’s lift it back!

AS: How many tables have you demolished since you started?

IO: We’ve demolished quite a number!

AS: I can say I was present on one occasion when you were using quite a heavy wooden table and the leg broke off it that night.

IO: And actually we have used two or three heavy wooden tables but one of the troubles… (much talking over her).

Come on! Right over! Mind the microphone! Don’t knock the mic! What are you doing! Get away! Chase Sidney then!

AS: Now in some experiments you have put paper doilies on the table under your hands, to show that you couldn’t possibly be applying pressure or friction, and yet the table has bounced around just the same way.

IO: And sometimes thing will stick to the table, if we put a sweet or something, even though the table…

AS: I’m putting my ring onto the table. Do you think it might stay?

IO: Swallow it right up! Now Philip you’ve got his ring! Bend it! Bend it, Philip! (Much exhorting) (It falls on the floor. The table leg has bent up again). Not the leg!

AS: I take it that if you’ve demolished several tables, Philip then doesn’t have a preference for one 
particular table. He moves from one to the other.

IO: Oh yes any table anywhere.  One of the reasons why we don’t use the big tables quite so much is because we’re frightened about the house getting damage. Last time we used a wooden garden table it went and knocked holes in the wall.

AS: And he’s also produced raps and thumps in the wall, hasn’t he? What about the big question – has Philip ever been able to get the table off the floor completely - all four legs?

IO: Yes! Well why don’t you do it tonight, Philip? He did it once, only about ½ an inch off the floor, and it only went for two or three feet. But there were two other witnesses in the room, and er, it was a thick carpeted floor, if it had been… (indistinct).

AS: Well let’s try it now.

IO: Come on this is your big opportunity! Maybe your last opportunity! Come on, right up! Straight up! Come on! Shall we sing you a song?! Up in the air! (rather drunken-sounding singing) (The table wobbles and the leg collapses).

AS: He’s wrecked four tables and now he’s working on his fifth! What about turning the table upside down – and I know that this happened, getting the raps while the table is upside down? Let’s do that. Let’s keep it within range of our trusty microphone here. All right, now the bottom of the table is clearly exposed.

(They crouch and put their hands on the upturned table)

IO: Hello Philip! Are you enjoying being here tonight?! Come on, Philip!

Come on Philip, say hello, are you still there?! (a bump) Aah.

IO: Philip, if you perform you can have a nice big pint of beer, would you like that? (a bump)

AS: Now that was the loudest rap of the evening.

He loves his beer, hahah. (Rather drunken sounding singing of ‘one hundred bottles of beer on the wall’ including hiccups and laughing).

IO: Would you like two bottles of beer? Yes? A little bit louder than that. Let Allen hear you want two bottles of beer.

AS: Yeah, there’s a rap.  Now all hands are visible, let’s just dwell on this point. All hands are visible, but at this point all raps are clearly coming from, it would appear, certainly, from within that table. 

Let’s try it again. Philip, give us a good loud clear rap.

IO: For one bottle of beer. (Bump) Louder than that!

Louder for two! Come on Philip. If you want a bottle of beer, rap loudly! Louder, Philip! Come on Philip, louder! Here comes the microphone! It has to be louder or Allen won’t buy it! One rap right under the microphone. Here Phil, right here. Come on Philip, louder. Louder! That’s better! Ooh!

AS: Congratulations Philip. Alright, let’s stand him up right side up. What sort of questions does Philip respond to, can we ask him about er… (much laughter) … sex and beer are his, er.. Well let’s ask him some questions.

IO: Philip have you got Dorothea with you? No. Have you got Margot with you? Yes!

AS: Now Margot was his lover, the gypsy girl.

IO: What else shall we ask him. Oh yes, did you bring.. Is Lileth here?

AS: Now who is Lileth?

IO: It’s from another group. Now I told you this was a scientific experiment, and experiments have to be repeatable. So we decided that if our thesis was true, another group of people should be able to do the same thing with a different story.

AS: So Lileth is another imaginary ghost?

IO: Another imaginary ghost. A heroine of the French Resistance who lived in Canada and was sent up during wartime to work with the French Resistance. She was betrayed and shot as a spy by the Germans. And she had a Canadian Officer lover. And Philip has met Lileth and he’s quite friendly with her.

AS: Can I ask any of you who would like to answer – now you are all thoughtful intelligent people. You have professional backgrounds, you’re skilled in your various fields. How do you really feel about this Philip phenomenon? Sue?

Sue: I think it is purely a physical thing, coming from the brain, that any human being who has trained in the skill can do it. It’s just it takes some training to develop the skill, and I think it’s a source of energy which perhaps we have helped to find, and then maybe it can someday be used as a source of energy.

AS: Lorne, how do you feel about it?

Lorne: I just think that.. in respect to the fact we’ve produced artificially the sort of effects that you generally get from, what are supposed to be ghosts.

AS: In other words, the minds of you people working together have been able to produce movements in this table, raps in answers to your questions – all the things that traditionally ghosts have done. So are you saying that the traditional ghost may have been a projection from the minds of living people?

Lorne: That’s my view.

AS: Do you all agree with that?

It could be, it could be that. Yeah. It could be one of the answers to it.

AS: OK let’s ask Philip a question, we’ve got about one minute left for Philip in this command performance here. What’s going to get him to give us a good loud answer, as a kind of grand finale for him. You people know his feelings. Does he love, what’s the gypsy?

IO: Do you still love Margot, Philip?

Sue: Do you want to come on TV again, Philip?

He’s gone shy all of a sudden.

AS: Are you still there Philip? (a creak) Give us one more rap for goodbye.

IO: Say goodbye to Allen.

A real loud one. Louder than that.

IO: He’s saying no. He doesn’t want to go.

Give us one rap, Philip.
 We must go Philip, one loud goodbye for everyone.
Do you miss (Jo?) Hmm ?hmm. Louder still. Say goodbye George.

AS: We’re going to have to say goodbye to Philip for now, and we’ll be back in a moment to ‘rap’ this up with some more information about Philip.



IV

AS: My guest on Extra Special People is Iris Owen from the Toronto Society for Psychical Research. And Iris, that must be about the wildest sequence ever seen on television! A group of grown people with a table bouncing around and answering questions. But let’s get serious now. It’s a marvellous party game, having a talking table. But there’s something deeper than that involved. What the implications of this Philip experiment?

IO: Well of course as you say, Allen, there is a serious scientific experiment. And there are two aspects of it that are important. Firstly, the part that is of interest to the physicists – how does a combined thought from a group of people transform itself into something that can produce a physical effect such as a noise or a table movement.

AS: I should say that to me these pings from within the table are the most singular thing about the phenomenon. And I have put my hand on the table more than once and have felt the vibration, the pulsation, directly under it.

IO: Yes, it is the most extraordinary thing.

AS: The second thing –

IO: The second thing is of interest to psychologists. The physical, the psychological background of a group of people getting themselves into a state of mind where they can in fact share a common thought and a, produce these things.

AS: For one thing, you have to be in a kind of childlike frame of mind, don’t you?

IO: We describe it as a psychological skill, and it’s learnt just as in the same way as when you’re learning to the piano you have to start with the scales and go all the way through until you can play something in the nature of classical music, this is a psychological skill that we learn, in this way. And this is why it’s, erm, it doesn’t happen as often as one would think it must.

AS: Well maybe you’ll have some more imaginary ghosts around. Well, Iris Owen, it’s been marvellous having you on the programme, and we will be back again with more Extra Special People, and we’ll be talking to interesting folks who inhabit that shadowy world that lies on the border between science and superstition, the known and the unknown. They’re all unusual. They’re all Extra Special People.

 

The Cyfarthfa Works

Cyfarthfa Blast Furnaces


The Cyfarthfa Works Haunted.

The chief dramatis personae in the wonderful scenes related are gentlemen of the highest integrity and of unblemished reputation. They, we have no doubt, believe that their experiences were stubborn realities.

"I had occasion," says the narrator of this most remarkable adventure, "to visit Cyfarthfa Works at night lately, in company with a friend. Cyfarthfa works have been familiar to me for many years, but they were associated with the fullest activity, with the glare of furnaces, the whirl of the rolls; and that picture was vividly in my imagination when we stood at length before the works that were slumbering in thick darkness, and as silent as the grave. No change could have been greater, no stillness more profound. We were far enough from the town to lose its glare and its noise, and outof the way of the people journeying from one place to another.

"We stood a while just within the dense shadow of one of the mills, just tracing the ponderous wheels and the dimly outlined rolls, when suddenly the huge wheels croaked and began to revolve, the rolls to move, and in a moment there was all the whirl of industry again, only needing the glare of light and forms of men to assure us that the works were in full action. My companion, with an exclamation of profound astonishment, clasped me by the arm.

"Cast iron man as he is, strong-minded and proof against the superstitions of the age, I felt his voice tremble as he said, 'This is most strange. There are no men here; the works are stopped; no steam, no motive power.' And the grip on my arm became severe. I, too, felt alarmed, and am not ashamed to confess it. My imagination, livelier than that of his, conjured up misty shades, and I saw shapes flitting to and fro, and heard the cry of men and boys amidst the clanging iron. Involuntarily we stepped back into the air, and as suddenly as the medley arose, so it died away: not a wheel moved, all was hushed and at rest.

"We walked away a little distance, our purpose unaccomplished. My friend better able than I to afford a clue, was, like myself, utterly at sea, and could give no explanation. 'But,' said he, resolutely, 'it must be [?]ed, and we will find it out.' With these words he hurried back again to the works. I followed, and in a few minutes again stood looking into the silent mill. There was the same strange hush, the same weird gloom that appeared palpable did we but attempt to grasp it; but no sound. 'Was it fancy?' said my friend, with his cheerful laugh. He had scarcely spoken when the great wheel again revolved, and machinery here and there, to the right, to the left, ponderous wheels and rolls, all sprang into motion and the din of work was perfect in its fullness. With this came the clanging of falling iron, the rattle of trams sounded strangely alike, and again the impression was strong that puddlers and moulders flitted by, and ghostly labour went on.

"This was sufficient for us. We hurriedly left the scene, and on our way home met one of the old ironworkers of Cyfarthfa going to Cefn, to whom my friend related the circumstance. He knew the man as an old and respectable inhabitant, and made no secret of what we had heard. 'Ha,' stopping and leaning on his stick, 'I have heard it too'; and, sinking his voice, he continued, 'it always comes when the works are stopped. It did one time before, many years ago, and when Mr. Robert was living it came again. No one can say what is the reason, and perhaps it is best not to make any stir about it.'"

Our correspondent has not done the same as the over-man, but gives the narrative. He adds "This I know, that the hearts of the Crawshays have been bound up with their great iron industry. Richard was never happier than in his works, William never slept so well as in the sound of his great hammer. Robert's last look of keenest interest was on the old furnaces and mills. If omens are true in these secular as in Scriptural days, and to the degenerate Briton as to the Greek and Roman, let us accept it as an augury of good, and these ghostly shadows forerunners of the big event, a genuine practical start at Cyfarthfa."

--Weekly Mail, Aug. 20th.

In the Cornishman, 25th August 1881.

According to dear Wikipedia, the works closed in 1875, but they were rebuilt and reopened in 1884. Who knows if this story is a genuine anecdote from someone, or more a bit of publicity for the site and the family's efforts to get it going again. It would have been very important to the local economy, so people would have been keen for that to happen, I'd expect. I'm erring on that side really. 

It's a huge site by all accounts, and it fell into disrepair in the 1920s. It now looks pretty spooky judging by the photo below (well, if you're there in the dark ).



Photo by Perceval, of the abandoned Cyfarthfa Ironworks at Merthyr Tydfil.



 



Ghost Hunters: Haunted Ballroom.


So the haunting at the church hall had been going on for, like, 30 years? Surely the place should be stuffed with ghost hunters and their equipment.

There's a lot of talk about modern ideas of consciousness. This is something I haven't read up about. But you can't help thinking that things can't have come on in quite the positive way that the scientists in this programme insist - otherwise surely we'd have made some sort of considerable breakthrough by now and it'd be generally known. I need to do some reading.

Also mentioned is the Stone Tape Theory. It's an oldie but a goodie. It's so tempting. But again, this programme was made 20 years ago and what progress has been made with it. One imagines, precisely none, unfortunately. And I suppose that's because it's just not in a form that's scientifically plausible or testable. I've signed up to a course run by Edinburgh University this autumn, and I imagine it'll be discussing the methods that parapsychologists use. But it won't be touching on anything so wacky. I imagine it'll be adaptations of methodology currently used in psychology and social sciences, and relying on statistics. What else can you do, when ghosts refuse to appear on demand? 


Narrator: Stories of ghosts or hauntings, spirits from another world, call them what you will, tend to be associated with the emotions of fear and dread. Perhaps that’s inevitable. But it’s by no means always the case. In this program we look at the other end of the spectrum. Two stories of hauntings that seem to arise as a result not of pain, but of pleasure – the intense emotional attachment to a place where there has been great happiness.

Rita Cole, Dance Instructor: I never ever believed in ghosts. In fact I used to scoff at people who did. I used to think, you know, it’s odd, I just can’t understand it at all. No such thing. And it took a lot for me to understand how and why it happens. But now, I wouldn’t scoff at anyone, because it does happen.

Dennis Cole, Dance Instructor: Well, it’s just a fact that I cannot disregard what has happened. What I’ve heard and what I’ve seen. So now I can only believe that there must be something other than we humans!

Rita: Just before Miss MacPherson retired, she said to me ‘You know Rita, I will never ever leave this place’. And you know I don’t think she ever will. And I hope she never does!

Narrator: This story of love from beyond the grave comes from the city of York. This church is right in the heart of the city. And in the church hall here Mary MacPherson, known to everybody as Mary Mac, ran a very happy and very popular school of ballroom dancing.

Rita: Miss MacPherson was a very strong personality, a very strong character. Brilliant dancer, brilliant dance technician, a wonderful lady in general. Had her idiosyncracies! But at the time I had a great admiration for her. For her work and for her as a person. She was very direct, and very very forthright, strong. But immaculate in appearance. I never saw her with a hair out of place. Her clothes were always very expensive tastes.

Narrator: Rita and Dennis Cole had been persuaded by Mary to take over the running of the school. And it may be it was with some prescience, as within a year she died of a brain tumour. But it seems she was determined to keep her word never to leave the place. Because immediately after her death, strange things began to happen.

Rita: I started dancing, or I took over the studio in 1964, and slightly after that when I started hearing sounds after Miss MacPherson died. And I heard the counting of the coins first, when I was waiting for a pupil to arrive. And all of a sudden I heard this noise, with heavy coinage being banged onto this desk. Counted up and banged onto the desk. And  I walked across the room, and the nearer I got to the desk the louder the sound became. But when I reached the desk it stopped. So I walked back and it started again. So I didn’t dare tell anybody about this and I kept it very much to myself. And then my mother, she came down one day and she had the same experience. And she came home, rather looking aghast, and I said ‘what’s wrong?’ and she said ‘I was at the studio and I heard this strange noise.’ I said ‘Was it the counting of money?’ She said yes it was  - and banged into piles? She said yes. So and you’ve also heard it? I said, yes I have. She said, and you never told no-one? I said no, I didn’t tell anyone, I thought they’d think I was crazy!

Dennis: One evening when we were teaching, footsteps came up the corridor, came into the cloakroom, and the couple I was taking – we were waiting for them, whoever it was, coming into the hall. And the gentleman I was taking, of the couple I was taking, said ‘Oh I think she must be shy.’ And I went to the cloakroom to see this female – because it was the sound of high heels – and erm, of course there was just no-one there. I couldn’t disregard that, and nor could the couples that were in there at the time.

Rita: We started hearing footsteps coming down the corridor, and then we’d hear the door open. And we have a metal coat rail, and we’d hear the metal hangers being taken off and replaced. And we’d go and see who it was, and there was never anyone there. We went out into the street to see if the feet were outside, and we were getting the kind of echo coming up the corridor, but we didn’t, there was just no-one there at all. We had two young ladies, very very young ladies, early teens, about 12,13, and one evening they came to me one evening for a drink – they wanted a squash or a coke, so I served them with it, gave them their change. They went to sit down to drink their coke, and had a sip out of the coke and my husband said to them – now it’s time you two got up and had a dance! You see. So they put their drinks down, and they put the change that I’d given them down, and they got up to dance. And all of a sudden the change flew up into the air and landed onto the floor, and Sally-Ann – she was a lovely little girl, always brushing her hair – so her hairbrush always was with her, and her hairbrush shot up under the chair too! So they came howling into the kitchen to me and said, Oh, Rita! And they told me what had happened, you see. And I said well, Are you frightened of the money?! And they said, We don’t want it. Well I’ll change it for you, I’ll give you another ten pence each! So I did, I swapped it over for them. But nothing I could do about the hair brush! So she took it to church the next morning and had it blessed!

Narrator: So extraordinary things have happened in the church hall. How do we know that it is Mary Mac who is responsible? Well there have been a number of sightings of the old lady going about her business. Remarkably, whenever that has happened, people have smelt Mary Mac’s perfume, the scent of carnations about the place.

Rita: A lady, one evening I had her for a lesson, and then she used to come back to a class afterwards. And she came back for her class afterwards, and she said to me, ‘Who was that old lady you had for a lesson after me?’ Old lady? I said, I didn’t have an old lady after you. She said ‘You did, I passed her in the corridor and she gave me a very funny look.’ And I said, no, I’m sorry, it was my coffee break, I didn’t have anyone. So I said, describe this lady to me, please. So she says,’she was a smallish lady, very smart, very immaculate, a blueish rinse in her hair, and she had a creamy fluffy blouse and a navy blue suit on, are you sure you didn’t see her?’ I said, I’m positive. I said if I were to show you a picture, a group picture, could you have picked that lady out for me? Now this girl, she was a stranger to York, she’d come to work in York with the bank, and this was years after Miss MacPherson had died. So I produced a photograph which was taken in London at Grosvenor House, and the girl immediately went to the lady who had the dancing school before me, which was Miss MacPherson.

Narrator: Eventually the story of the haunted ballroom reached the ears of John Mitchell, who then was researching a book on the ghosts of York. John is a highly experienced paranormal investigator.

John Mitchell: I think that this is one of the most remarkable cases that was collected, because of the characters of the witnesses. I have known them now for over twenty years, they have never altered their story. They have nothing to gain and a great deal to lose if they came out into the public eye, and I just believe in them.

Narrator: So what is happening in the church hall at St Mary’s? It does seem that Mary MacPherson loved the place and her life here so much that in some strange way she has maintained a connection with it. Some element of her personality, down to the detail of the perfume she used, seems to have survived her death.

John Mitchell: There is certainly personality after death – what form of life it is I don’t know. I mean, obviously if we accept the story of the couple going out and being able to describe what she was wearing and the scent of carnations, then obviously Mary Mac is still wearing the sort of clothes she was wearing when she was part of the school in the physical life.

Narrator: The question of consciousness is still a very murky area. Our general understanding is that our consciousness, our vital sense of self, resides within our brains and when the brain dies so does our consciousness. But many mainstream scientists are now asking whether that can possibly be the whole story, as there are so many cases where despite the absence of the working brain, so to speak, through the use of anaesthetics, for example, the mind still continues to operate. This raises the distinct possibility that even after the dissolution of the brain, in death, some part of our personality could go on functioning.

Ralph Noyes, Science Writer: I think there is a mass of evidence for the continuation of consciousness after the dissolution of the particular gubbins we happen to be lodged in for the time being in this three-dimensional place. Erm, I can’t say that I’m utterly convinced. I think that different interpretations could be placed on the material which has come through. But there’s a pretty strong indication that we continue, consciousness continues, personality continues. If I had to bet on it, I’d bet on it. I’d give it odds.

Brian Josephson, Nobel Laureate in Physics: The assumption that scientists usually make is that the mind is just the brain. On the other hand I feel that the evidence from psychical research suggests that while it is certainly influenced by the brain, it is something more than the brain. For example, experiments where people appear to be able to view what’s going on at a distance, as if they were there, rather suggest that the mind has some extension and part of it at any rate can travel about. So the brain may just be a computer that the mind can use.

Peter Fenwick, Consultant Neuro-psychiatrist:  The old science is breaking down at the edges. The evidence is accumulating that you have now to take into account the fact that mind can act outside the brain. And that then opens the whole question of entities going on after death, of there being some imprint on this world caused by people who have lived. And we just have to take these questions now as real scientific questions, and generate the appropriate theories to explain them.

John Mitchell: And  I think that if it is Miss MacPherson she is keeping a very friendly eye on the place. She’s not a frightening character, I think she seems rather benevolent. She just likes to look in occasionally and see that all is well. But of course she had to make her self known somehow. Perhaps the rattling of the coathangers, the counting of the money – obviously she’s a Yorkshire ghost if she’s interested in the money still! – and these were her way of drawing attention to herself.

Rita: Miss MacPherson loved the dancing world. She loved it and I don’t think she ever wants to go away from us. She’s happy with the people, she’s happy just circulating. I’m sure that’s it.

Narrator: Just across the Pennines from the city of York is the equally historic city of Lancaster. And in the centre of Lancaster is the Grand Theatre, one of the oldest theatres in the country – it goes back to the beginning of the eighteenth century. It has a very long history of paranormal activity. In her prime the great actress Sarah Siddons played here. Tonight the star billing goes to Al Jolson.

Steve King: Here at the Grand in Lancaster, which is over two hundred years old now, I had a strange feeling. I mean there are ghosts, there have got to be ghosts in a theatre that old. But I had a strange feeling when I was doing the Jolson, I got a cold shiver as though somebody had walked over my grave, sort of thing. And I don’t know, I just felt there was something there at that particular moment. And if it’s the ghost of the theatre, who might be haggling with Al Jolson… I could see a fight starting [laughs].

Narrator: The experience described by Al Jolson (or Steve King to give him his real name) is by no means uncommon. Over the years many members of the audience, as well as players on the stage have described unusual, inexplicable experiences. Many of them, strangely, talk of apparitions that seem to float in the air, well above the existing floor level. At first hearing, that seems to make them stranger than ever. But as it happens there is a very practical explanation.

Ray Langley, Civil Engineer: The old building is different to what it is now. The pit floor was at a higher level. And of course the circle, you had the Georgian type boxes along the sides and the back. So of course, if there was anybody haunting, you might say, they would be walking along the old level.

Tosa Laurence, Lancaster Footlights: The time that I had an experience was when I was working on a costume play. And to see the effect as it was on the stage I walked through the auditorium to about half way up the aisle, and turned round, and saw a lady of indeterminate age who was walking between me and the stage. And I said ‘What are you doing there?’ And at that moment she faded. It wasn’t like a puff of smoke, she faded like an old photograph fades, until there was nothing there. I found it very upsetting and I have not spoken to anybody about it except one member of the Footlights. We were doing the Taming of the Shrew at the time and this lady was certainly dressed in a period-type costume, but of the wrong period! And this is why she struck me as being in the way, and I was annoyed, and my tone must have been very annoyed. There was one other thing. I later realised that she wasn’t walking on the floor. She was neither at the height of the stage, nor at the height of the auditorium, it was somewhere in between. But I was concentrating on the costume rather than anything else.

Narrator: Melanie Warren is a very well-known paranormal investigator. She’s taken great interest in the goings-on at the Grand.

Melanie Warren: Tosa’s evidence impressed me because it matches several other stories that I’ve heard. In the 1950s Pat Phoenix, who was an actress, was working here. She saw a similar person, and she disappeared in much the same way as Tosa described. And also Myra Jackson, who saw a woman on the stage. It seems to be the same woman that everybody’s seeing. I think Tosa’s testimony impresses me because she is such a strong lady in herself. And she really is not keen on talking about the experience that she had. She only came on the programme and talked about it because she was convinced that she saw something, even though she can’t explain it.

Tosa Laurence: I have personally never had any experience of ghosts. I can’t say that I believe in ghosts. I know this was something that I may have imagined because it was so fleeting. But no I’m not that sort of person. I’m extremely realistic really!

Narrator: As we mentioned, in her heyday the famous 18th century actress Sarah Siddons played at the Grand. She came to Lancaster at least partly because her brother in law ran the theatre. Legend has it that her spirit remains to haunt the place. We called in a very experienced psychic medium, Joan Norton, to see if she might establish contact with anything that might be historically verified.  We gave her no warning of where she was going.

Joan Norton: But I feel particularly drawn to behind me, to that corner over there. Strong vibrations. Over here a different feeling again. Er I feel as though something’s coming down on me here.

Narrator: Well Joan didn’t make contact with Sarah Siddons. But there seems to be some connection with the theatre’s distant history.

Melanie Warren: She’s come up with a few bits of evidence that fit the facts. She mentioned, for example, that she got the feeling of a fire here. Now this entire theatre, the interior of it was completely destroyed, and much of the roof went as well, when there was a fire here at the end of the last century, and the place has been completely rebuilt. She also said she felt that there was something below the theatre, downstairs. She wasn’t to know that in its original form there were dwelling houses actually underneath the theatre. She also said that her strongest feeling was on the left side of the stage.

Joan Norton: The names very significantly attached to the theatre are Walter and Alexander.

Melanie Warren: She came up with one name Walter, and a very brief look through the history has shown that there was a Walter. She said that Walter was connected with the running of the building. There was a Walter. Edmund Sharp took over the building in 1843. He worked wonders for the building. He died in 1877 and he passed on the building to his two sons and another gentleman called Walter. This was in 1877. Again it’s the Victorian era we’re looking at. All the evidence that’s coming in seems to suggest that whatever is going on here dates from the Victorian era.

Narrator: Theatres of course everywhere have a long tradition of connection with the paranormal. The life of these buildings is suffused with emotion and passion and high drama, as the actors strut and fret their lives upon the stage. It isn’t difficult to believe that here if anywhere the very fabric of the building absorbs some of the emotion that is expended down the years. It is classical stone tape theory.

Leslie Ryan, Lancaster Footlights: This is a theatre, emotion is high. I reckon a lot of it must dissipate into the vastness behind you!

Archie Roy, Prof. of Astronomy: One theory of haunts is one which may be called for want of a better phrase, the stone tape theory, where you have to postulate that in the case of a typical haunt some very emotion laden scene, or one very important scene from the point of view of the humans that took part in it – has somehow become registered on the environment. Not necessarily within a house, maybe even outside. And that it looks, it’s almost like a psychic video that has been created. And someone who comes along who is sensitive enough to act as a psychic video player will play that tape, and see the figures or perhaps even hear voices or hear sounds. And it is nothing to do with the people who originally were there, they are no longer there, it is simply a record.

Melanie Warren: I am not convinced that ghosts are the spirits of dead people. I tend to think that they’re more likely to be recordings on the atmosphere, or emotions trapped in the fabric of the building. It’s a very difficult theory to explain, but that’s the simplest we can come to it.

Leslie Ryan: It often happens after we’ve done a costume play or we’re re-enacting something in period, that the appearances get intensified.

Narrator: Well Al Jolson could scarcely be described as costume drama perhaps. But it isn’t hard to imagine the ringing tones of this old tin pan alley number seeping into the bricks and mortar, and adding another layer to the emotional fabric of the grand old theatre.